Hi Kirt,
The Brand New, "Advanced Internet Marketing E-Class" is Guaranteed to Multiply Your Sales by At Least 10 Times it's $1995 Cost or it's FREE!
$2000 for a course. It's a bit pricey mate.
Not all businesses are sales sites you know. So any advice would have to be targeted at ALL types of business for it to be useful. But that would involve too much work to design into a seminar, so it's got to be a one size fits all event, unless it's only very basic advice, that can be applied to any business -but that will be seen to have a lower impact by the delegates.
Also calling it advanced, sorry, but what's that going to tell me - nothing! I've got 'advanced' marketing knowledge, and so have others. You need to define exactly what that means, then people can make a decision if it's suitable for them.
Do you provide some sort of brochure, or contents book to interested delegates -before the event?
The problem with the net is that most sites make no money at all, they stick around for years in the hope that it will sell - this is a problem if you're selling the wrong thing, as many are!
If you're selling information, chances are it can be picked from the web for nothing - I know this as I've actually done it, I have nearly 500 articles on my site - and they didn't cost me a penny! There's the proof.......
Okay, some articles are pretty informative, and some are just echos of useless techniques, but my point is if you can use a search engine, you can easily find the stuff. And it's all very basic stuff anyway, which involves so much effort to get even anything out of it - it's only going to eat into your time.
Okay then, what level is this seminar aimed at?
I'll add some more opinions when you have kindly answered that question.
Thanks
regards
> Christopher,
> If have an honest question about anything relating to this event, feel
> free to email me at:
> webmaster@scientificmarketing.com The proof is in the pudding, as they
> say, and I have no problem offering proof, but not on a public forum, and
> not when you haven't signed a legally binding non-disclosure agreement.
> Being skeptical is good -- but dismissing the easily provable statements
> that I've made is another 
> Best of luck...
> Kirt Christensen
... *DNO*